Article

Evaluation of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai Extract in Litter Quality and Footpad Dermatitis in Broiler Litter

Sehyun Park1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-9496, Jihwan Lee2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-4853, Seyeon Chang1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2982, Dongcheol Song1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5704-603X, Kyeongho Jeon1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-3319, Hyuck Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5280-0734, Jinmo Yang1https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4272-3441, Jinho Cho3,https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-0778
Author Information & Copyright
1Researcher, Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
2Ph.D., Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Republic of Korea
3Professor, Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea

* These authors contributed equally to this work.

To whom correspondence should be addressed : jinhcho@cbnu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2024, Korean Society of Poultry Science. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 24, 2024; Revised: Sep 05, 2024; Accepted: Sep 19, 2024

Published Online: Dec 31, 2024

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai (AN) extract in litter moisture, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), pH, microflora, and FPD. A total of 180 one-day-old Arbor Acres (initial body weight of 37.51±0.17 g) were used for 28 d. Treatments were as follows: basal rice husk + 10 mL tap water (AN0), basal rice husk + 2% AN extract soluble (AN2; 0.2 g/mL), basal rice husk + 4% AN extract soluble (AN4; 0.4 g/mL). Each treatment had five replicates, with twelve birds per pen. At 0 to 2 weeks, the AN0 and AN2 significantly increased the feed intake (FI) compared with the AN4. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in litter moisture during the experiment period. However, at week 4, the AN0 significantly increased (P<0.05) litter pH compared with the AN2 and AN4. At 3 and 4 weeks, the counts of Salmonella in the litter were significantly higher (P<0.05) in the AN0 compared with the AN2 and AN4. Also, the AN4 showed significantly lower (P<0.05) counts of Salmonella compared with the AN0 and AN4. Moreover, at 4 weeks, the AN0 showed significantly higher (P<0.05) counts of E. coli compared with the AN4. Also, AN4 showed significantly decreased (P<0.05) FPD scores compared with the AN0. Therefore, the result of this study could support the possibilities of AN extract in litter to alleviate the FPD.

Keywords: Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; footpad dermatitis; litter

INTRODUCTION

Footpad dermatitis (FPD), which is also known as pododermatitis and contact dermatitis, is a common skin problem, reflecting the impaired product quality and animal welfare (Bilgili et al., 2009; Kauonen et al., 2016). The occurrence of FPD is accompanied by a walking disorder through a excruciating skin ailment that led to synovitis and subsequent lameness (Michel et al., 2012; Park et al., 2023). Also, previous studies have reported that the painful footpad skin condition reduced the growth performance in broilers (Martland, 1985; Kaukonen et al., 2016).

Commonly, the main cause of FPD in broilers is impaired litter quality. As broiler spends most of their lifetime on litter, impaired litter quality increases the occurrence of FPD (Bilgili et al., 2009). When the litter could not play the moisture absorption, it induces the risk of ‘wet litter’. According to Dunlop et al. (2016), once the litter moisture surpasses 25%, it could not provide the cushioning, insulation and water-holding capacity to broilers. Also, wet litter induces the microbial metabolism's volatilization of ammonia in the excreta, thereby increasing the bacterial pathogen activities and ammonia burns, which is another name for FPD (Kjaer et al., 2006; Garcia et al., 2012). Therefore, alternative strategies are needed for reducing the bacterial pathogens activities and concentration of ammonia.

Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai (AN) is the sole species within the genus Abeliophyllum in the world, which is mostly produced in Yeongdong region, Korea (Lee et al., 2020). It has been reported that AN could provide therapeutic value, such as anticancer (Yoo et al., 2000; Park et al., 2014), anti-i nflammatory (Choi et al., 2017), antidiabetic (Li et al., 2013), and antihypertensive capacity (Oh et al., 2003). Especially, AN contains glycosides (acteoside, isoactoside, rutin, and hirsutrin) in its leaves, which shows the antibacterial and antioxidant effects (He et al., 2000; Song et al., 2021). Also, AN possesses numerous physiologically active polyphenols and flavonoids, exhibiting antibacterial and antioxidant effects (Ko et al., 2019). Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated the antibacterial effect of AN extract, by using a mice and in-vitro method (Go et al., 2021; Song et al., 2021).

However, to our knowledge, there are currently no studies identifying the effects of AN extract in broiler litter conditions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the effects of AN extract in litter moisture, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), pH, microflora, and FPD in broilers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chung-buk National University, Cheongju, Korea, reviewd and approved the study's protocol (approval no. CBNUA-24-0003-02).

2. Source of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai Extract

The AN extract was supported by a Our Tree Farming Association (Chungcheongbuk-do, Goesan, Korea). The foreign body that contained in AN leaves and stems were washed with distilled water and then dried with using an agricultural product dryer at 40°C to contain less than a 15% moisture content. Dried AN was extracted for 5 hours at 70°C, and then moved to a evaporator tank. Afterwards, it went through a filtration process with a 50μm filter and was concentrated to over 10 brix at an internal temperature of 70°C before being stored.

3. Experimental Design, Animals, and Housing

A total of 180 mixed-sex one-day-old Arbor Acres (initial body weight of 37.51±0.17 g) were provided from a local hatchery (Dongsan hatchery, Cheonan, Korea) and used in this experiment for 28 d. A randomized complete block design was used to randomly assign each broiler to one of three treatments. Treatments were as follows: basal rice husk + 10 mL tap water (AN0), basal rice husk + 2% AN extract soluble (AN2; 0.2 g/mL), basal rice husk + 4% AN extract soluble (AN4; 0.4 g/mL). Each treatment had five replicates, with twelve birds per pen. The broilers were housed in pen (12 birds/ m2) and fed ad libitum access to diet and water throughout the experiments. The stocking density per broiler has been set following Korean animal welfare standards. The 5 kg of rice husk was given to each pen as litter, and AN extract was sprayed on the surface of the litter weekly, by using a small hand pump. After starting experiment initiation temperature was 31±1°C, the temperature was gradually decreased to 21±1°C. For the first 7 d, the lighting schedule was 23L:1D at 30 lux, then 18L:6D at 20 lux.

Also, for the starter (1−7 d), grower (8−21 d), and finisher (22−28 d) periods, all diets were formulated to meet or exceed National Research Council (1994).

4. Litter Sample Collection

A litter sample was taken from each pen at five different locations (four on the edges and one in the middle), weekly. Following a thorough mixing process, the litter samples were refrigerated at 4°C until analysis was completed.

5. Growth Performance

At initial, 7, 14, 28 d of age, body weight (BW), and feed consumption was determined per pen to calculate the average feed intake (FI), average daily gain (ADG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) for each phase.

6. Litter Quality

To determine the pH of the litter, 20 g of samples was mixed with 100 mL of distilled water according to Brink et al. (2022) method. After a period of 30 m, the pH of the sample was measured by pH meter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Orion Star A211 pH Benchtop Meter). To determine the litter moisture, 2 g of litter samples from each pen were dried in an oven for 8 h at 105°C (AOAC, 2005).

7. NH3-N Measurement

The intestinal content and the NH3-N concentration in fresh faecal samples were assessed using a technique that Weatherburn (1967) method. Ten minutes were spent centrifuging 3,000 × g of 10% TCA (trichloroacetic acid) mixture over duplicate samples in a 1:1 (w/v) ratio. After that, samples were diluted five times (v/v) using distilled water. Following deproteinization, the liquid's ammonium was converted to indophenol blue in an alkaline solution containing phenol and hypochlorite. This reaction is named after Berthelot:

2 C 6 H 5 O + N H 6 + 3 C l O O C 6 H 4 N = C 6 H 4 O + 2 H 2 O + O H + 3 C l

The intensity of the blue colour formed in the above reaction is linear with the NH3-N concentration. Utilizing a spectrophotometer (UVmini-1240, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan), the absorbance at 623 nm was determined.

A 1 L volumetric flask filled to the mark with DW was used to dissolve 472 mg of ammonium sulphate [(NH4)2SO4, Ajax Finechem, NSW, Australia] in order to create a standard ammonium stock solution [100 ppm (mg/L) NH3-N]. The following concentrations were utilized five times for the calibration line: 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 ppm NH3-N. Using a UV-VIS Spectrophotometer (UVmini-1240, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan), the standards were prepared by pipetting 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mL of the stock solution into 100 mL volumetric flasks, respectively. The samples were then well mixed and brought up to 100 mL with water. The measurements were taken at 623 nm against water.

8. Litter Microflora

Every week, litter samples were gathered in conical tubes for analysis of the counts of litter microflora. From the sample, 1 g of the sample was combined with 9 mL of 1 × PBS buffer and vortexed for a duration of one minute. By plating tenfold serial dilutions (10−5 to 10−8) onto MacConkey agar (MB cell, Seoul, Korea) and BG sulfa (MB cell, Seoul, Korea) agar to isolate E. coli and Salmonella, the counts of bacteria in the litter samples were measured. The MacConkey agar and BG sulfa agar were cultured for 24 h at 37°C. Following the incubation times, the respective bacteria colonies were counted, and their counts were expressed as the logarithm of colony-forming unit per gram (log CFU/g).

9. Footpad Dermatitis Score

Following the Martrenchar et al. (2002) method, footpad dermatitis was scored based on the type of lesion in all birds at the end of the experiment. Following the broiler euthanasia, the footpad lesion score was: A lesion covering less than 25% of the sole is scored 0, a big area lesion encompassing between 25% and 50% of the sole is scored 2, and a lesion covering more than 50% of the plantar surface is scored 3.

10. Statistical Analysis

Using each pen as the experimental unit, all data were analyzed using SAS's general linear model techniques (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Differences between treatment means were analyzed by using Tukey’s multiple range test. A level of 0.05≤P<0.10 was shown to be statistically significant, and a probability level of P<0.05 was shown to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

1. Growth Performance

The effects of spraying AN extract in the litter on growth performance is presented in Table 1. At 0 to 2 weeks, the AN0 and AN2 significantly increased the feed intake (FI) compared with the AN4. However, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) during experiment period.

Table 1. Effect of spraying AN extract on growth performance in broiler’s litter1
Items AN0 AN2 AN4 SE P-value
BW, kg
Initial 37.32 37.75 37.45 0.173 0.243
d 7 136.12 124.76 129.93 7.256 0.557
d 14 433.00 412.00 398.00 14.341 0.260
d 21 849.00 854.00 855.00 13.988 0.949
d 28 1,392.00 1,390.00 1,398.00 15.895 0.934
BWG, g
d 0—14 395.68 374.25 360.55 14.321 0.256
d 15—28 959.00 978.00 1,000.00 27.234 0.581
d 0—28 1,354.68 1,352.25 1,360.55 15.961 0.932
FI, g
d 0—14 547.54a 565.55a 544.40b 4.976 0.011
d 15—28 1672.56 1699.53 1728.54 29.906 0.441
d 0—28 2,231.10 2,265.09 2,295.94 32.000 0.388
FCR, g/g
d 0—14 1.44 1.52 1.53 0.062 0.553
d 15—28 1.75 1.74 1.74 0.058 0.990
d 0—28 1.65 1.68 1.69 0.031 0.654

1 AN0, basal rice husk + 10 mL; AN2, basal rice husk + 2% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN4, basal rice husk + 4% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN, Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; BW, body weight; BWG, body weight gain; FI, feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio; SE, standard error.

a,b Means within column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

Download Excel Table
2. Litter Quality

The effects of spraying AN extract in the litter on moisture and pH are presented in Table 2. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in litter moisture during experiment period. However, at weeks 4, the AN0 significantly increased (P<0.05) litter pH compared with the AN2 and AN4.

Table 2. Effect of spraying AN extract on litter moisture and pH in broiler’s litter1
Items (%) AN0 AN2 AN4 SE P-value
Moisture
d 7 14.56 15.84 15.71 1.131 0.689
d 14 27.76 22.70 22.24 1.870 0.109
d 21 28.83 28.54 30.71 4.188 0.925
d 28 32.67 30.91 30.79 4.743 0.952
pH
d 7 6.83 6.86 6.85 0.228 0.996
d 14 7.24 7.08 7.16 0.161 0.798
d 21 7.40 7.31 7.27 0.117 0.716
d 28 7.89a 7.39b 7.38b 0.077 0.001

1 AN0, basal rice husk + 10 mL; AN2, basal rice husk + 2% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN4, basal rice husk + 4% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN, Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; SE, standard error.

a,b Means within column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

Download Excel Table
3. NH3-N Measurement

The effects of spraying AN extract in the litter on NH3-N is presented in Table 3. During the experiment periods, the AN0 showed significantly highest (P<0.05) NH3-N levels compared with the AN2 and AN4. Also, the AN2 significantly increased (P<0.05) NH3-N levels compared with the AN4 during experiment period.

Table 3. Effect of spraying AN extract on litter microflora content in broiler’s litter1
Items (%) AN0 AN2 AN4 SE P-value
E. coli
d 7 5.48 5.44 5.38 0.367 0.983
d 14 5.72 5.58 5.43 0.392 0.874
d 21 6.20 5.89 5.79 0.144 0.156
d 28 6.33a 6.05ab 5.95b 0.084 0.018
Salmonella
d 7 4.42 4.20 4.26 0.339 0.899
d 14 4.50 4.55 4.40 0.208 0.876
d 21 5.31a 4.52b 4.48b 0.194 0.016
d 28 5.35a 4.69b 4.67b 0.158 0.015

1 AN0, basal rice husk + 10 mL; AN2, basal rice husk + 2% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN4, basal rice husk + 4% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN, Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; E. coli, Escherichia coli; SE, standard error.

a,b Means within column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

Download Excel Table
4. Litter Microflora

The effects of spraying AN extract in the litter on microflora is presented in Table 4. At 3 and 4 weeks, the counts of Salmonella in the litter were significantly highest (P<0.05) in the AN0 compared with the AN2 and AN4. Also, the AN4 showed significantly lowest (P<0.05) counts of Salmonella compared with the AN0 and AN4. Moreover, at 4 weeks, the AN0 showed significantly higher (P<0.05) counts of E. coli compared with the AN4.

Table 4. Effect of spraying AN extract on litter NH3-N content in broiler’s litter1
Items (%) AN0 AN2 AN4 SE P-value
NH3-N
d 7 384.20a 354.20b 325.00c 3.636 <0.001
d 14 406.80a 379.43b 301.88c 3.361 <0.001
d 21 434.20a 376.40b 328.60c 3.691 <0.001
d 28 463.20a 393.20b 344.00c 2.743 <0.001

1 AN0, basal rice husk + 10 mL; AN2, basal rice husk + 2% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN4, basal rice husk + 4% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN, Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; NH3-N, ammonia nitrogen; SE, standard error.

a—c Means within column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

Download Excel Table
5. Footpad Dermatitis

The effects of spraying AN extract in the litter on FPD is presented in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, AN4 showed significantly decreased (P<0.05) FPD scores compared with the AN0.

Table 5. Effect of spraying AN extract on footpad dermatitis in broiler1
Score2 AN0 AN2 AN4 SE P-value
Average 2.00a 1.50ab 1.40b 0.141 0.024

1 AN0, basal rice husk + 10 mL; AN2, basal rice husk + 2% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN4, basal rice husk + 4% Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; AN, Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai; SE, standard error.

2 Lesion score: Lesion score was determined as follow: 0, no lesion; 1, lesion covering less than 25% of the sole of the foot large area lesion; 2, covering between 25% and 50% of the sole of the foot; 3, more than 50% of the lesion of the plantar.

a,b Means within column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

Download Excel Table

DISCUSSION

Nowadays, broilers are developed to gain rapid growth in breast muscle as well as for increased total BW than the increase of leg muscle (Miller et al., 1968; Clayton et al., 1978). In this regard, the increased BW induces higher pressure on leg muscles, thereby resulting in lower mobility and intensive contact with the foot litter (Škrbić et al., 2014). Therefore, several researchers suggested that the increased BW could result a higher incidence and severity of FPD in broilers (Nestor et al., 1985; Škrbić et al., 2014). However, in this study, there were no significant differences in BW between AN0, AN2, and AN4. This result confirmed that BW did not affect the incidence and severity of FPD in the present study.

Litter pH is a major factor in modulating ammonia volatilization. According to Reece et al. (1980), a low level of ammonia was released when the litter pH was under 7, whereas a higher level of ammonia was released in a litter with a pH of more than 8. Also, Carr et al. (1990) have reported that the higher litter pH level increases the release of ammonia. In this study, we observed the decreased litter pH by spraying AN extract in broiler litter. Previous studies have demonstrated that supplying antibacterial effects could decrease litter pH by reducing ammonia-producing bacteria (Oliveira et al., 2003; Park et al., 2023). It is well known that AN extract contains high levels of flavonoids and polyphenols, which produce an antibacterial effect (Ko et al., 2019). Also, this result was consistent with Go et al. (2021), who have reported decreased pH by using AN extract (0.0125, 0.05, and 0.5%) in mice. Therefore, decreased litter pH might be due to the antibacterial effect of AN extract.

The E. coli and Salmonella are pathogenic bacteria, which commonly emerged in impaired quality of litter (Sahoo et al., 2016). When the E. coli and Salmonella contact with the wound on the skin and mucous membranes, it induces the infiltration into bloodstream, thereby increasing the FPD incidence in broilers (Xavier et al., 2010). In this study, spraying AN extract reduced the counts of E. coli and Salmonella. Previous studies have reported that AN extract possesses antibacterial effects, due to its high amount of flavonoid and polyphenol (Ji et al., 1993; Song et al., 2021). Also, decreased litter pH induces unfavorable conditions for bacterial pathogens to survive and growth in broiler litter (Pope and Cherry, 2000). In agreement with this result, previous studies have supported that decreased litter pH condition results in reduced the counts of E. coli and Salmonella (Mcward and Taylor, 2000; Line, 2002). Therefore, the antibacterial effect and decreased pH litter condition might be attributed to the reduction of the counts of E. coli and Salmonella.

Nitrogen is a major source of producing ammonia, which is accumulated by the feces and urines in broiler litter (Vilela et al., 2020). Especially, nitrogen is converted into NH3-N through various factors, such as urea hydrolysis, bacterial activity, moisture, and pH in the litter (Kelleher et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2007). Previous studies have reported that the increase of NH3-N accelerates broiler health problems and high levels of ammonia emission (Tucker and Walker, 1992; Wang et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2007). In the current study, spraying AN extract showed a reduction of NH3-N in litter. In accordance with our result, Nahm (2005) have reported that reduction of litter pH decreased litter NH3-N by inhibiting urea hydrolysis. Also, Li et al. (2012) have supported that decreased bacterial activity could reduce the litter NH3-N. These results could support the decrease of litter NH3-N, by spraying AN extract in broiler litter.

The present study represented that spraying AN extract in broiler litter significantly reduced the FPD scores with the decrease of litter pH, litter microflora, and litter NH3-N. As these factors modulate the severity of FPD in broilers, a decrease in FPD scores might be reasonable in this study (Martins et al., 2013; Soliman et al., 2018). Consistently, previous studies have reported that a decrease in litter pH, litter microflora, and litter NH3-N could alleviate the FPD in broilers (Liu et al., 2007; Xavier et al., 2010; Kaukonen et al., 2016). However, in our knowledge, no research has been conducted the evaluation of spraying AN extract in the broilers. Therefore, to identify the exact mechanisms of alleviating FPD by spraying AN extract, additional studies are needed.

SUMMARY

The result of this study could suggest the effects of spraying AN extract in litter to alleviate the FPD. In this study, spraying 2 and 4% of AN extract decreased the litter pH, the counts of pathogenic bacteria count, NH3-N levels, and FPD score. However, research on the spraying of AN extract in broiler litter is insufficient. Thus, additional research is needed to identify the exact mechanisms of AN extract in broiler litter.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by “Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS)” through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021RIS-001).

REFERENCES

1.

AOAC 2005 Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists International: Official Methods. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

2.

Bilgili SF, Hess JB, Blake JP, Macklin KS, Saenmahayak B, Sibley JL 2009 Influence of bedding material on footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res 18(3):583-589.

3.

Brink M, Janssens GPJ, Demeyer P, Bağci Ö, Delezie E 2022 Ammonia concentrations, litter quality, performance and some welfare parameters of broilers kept on different bedding materials. Br Poult Sci 63(6):768-778.

4.

Carr LE, Wheaton FW, Douglass LW 1990 Empirical models to determine ammonia concentrations from broiler chicken litter. Trans ASAE 33(4):1337-1342.

5.

Choi J H, Seo EJ, Sung J, Choi KM, Kim H, Kim JS, Hyun TK 2017 Polyphenolic compounds, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai extract. J Appl Bot Food Qual 90:266-273.

6.

Clayton GA, Nixey C, Monaghan G 1978 Meat yield in turkeys. Br Poult Sci 19(6):755-763.

7.

Dunlop MW, Moss AF, Groves PJ, Wilkinson SJ, Stuetz RM, Selle PH 2016 The multidimensional causal factors of ‘wet litter’in chicken-meat production. Sci Total Environ 56(2):766-776.

8.

Garcia RG, Almeida Paz IC, Caldara FR, Nääs IA, Bueno LG, Freitas LW, Sim S 2012 Litter materials and the incidence of carcass lesions in broilers chickens. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 14:27-32.

9.

Go YB, Lee JH, Oh HJ, Kim YJ, An JW, Chang SY, Cho JH 2021 Evaluation of the wound healing ability of an Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai extract in ICR mouse and of antibacterial activity against human cutaneous flora. Korean J Agric Sci 48(3):567-574.

10.

He ZD, Lau KM, Xu HX, Li PC, But PPH 2000 Antioxidant activity of phenylethanoid glycosides from Brandisia hancei. J Ethnopharmacology 71(3):483-486.

11.

Ji L, Pan-fen W, Rong-liang Z, Zi-min L, Zhong-jian J 1993 Protection of phenylpropanoid glycosides from Pedicularis against oxidative hemolysis in vitro. Planta Med: 59(04):315-317.

12.

Kaukonen E, Norring M, Valros A 2016 Effect of litter quality on foot pad dermatitis, hock burns and breast blisters in broiler breeders during the production period. Avian Pathol 45(6):667-673.

13.

Kelleher BP, Leahy JJ, Henihan AM, O'dwyer TF, Sutton D, Leahy MJ 2002 Advances in poultry litter disposal technology–A review. Bioresour Technol 83(1):27-36.

14.

Kjaer JB, Su G, Nielsen BL, Sørensen P 2006 Foot pad dermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens and degree of inheritance. Poult Sci 85(8):1342-1348.

15.

Ko HM, Eom TK, Kim JS 2019 Antioxidant activity and phenolic acid content of Gynostemma pentaphyllum leaves according to extraction conditions. Korean J Agric Sci 46(1):85-92.

16.

Lee HD, Kim JH, Pang QQ, Jung PM, Cho EJ, Lee S 2020 Antioxidant activity and acteoside analysis of Abeliophyllum distichum. Antioxidants 9(11):1148.

17.

Li H, Lin C, White-Hansen S, Collier S, Brown W 2012 Assessment of repeated litter amendment application on ammonia reduction. In 2012 Dallas, Texas, July 29-August 1, 2012 (p. 1). Amer Soci Agri Biol Eng.

18.

Li HM, Kim JK, Jang JM, Cui CB, Lim SS 2013 Analysis of the inhibitory activity of Abeliophyllum distichum leaf constituents against aldose reductase by using high-speed counter current chromatography. Arch Pharm Res 36:1104-1112.

19.

Line JE 2002 Campylobacter and Salmonella populations associated with chickens raised on acidified litter. Pouly Sci 81(10):1473-1477.

20.

Liu Z, Wang L, Beasley D, Oviedo E 2007 Effect of moisture content on ammonia emissions from broiler litter: A laboratory study. J Atmosc Chem 58:41-53.

21.

Martins VL, Caley M, O’Toole EA 2013 Matrix metalloproteinases and epidermal wound repair. Cell Tissue Res 351:255-268.

22.

Martland MF 1985 Ulcerative dermatitis dm broiler chickens: The effects of wet litter. Avian Pathol 14(3):353-364.

23.

Martrenchar A, Boilletot E, Huonnic D, Pol F 2002 Risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in chicken and turkey broilers in France. Prev Vet Med 52(3-4):213-226.

24.

Mayne RK 2005 A review of the aetiology and possible causative factors of foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys and broilers. World's Poult Sci J 61(2):256-267.

25.

McWard GW, Taylor DR 2000 Acidified clay litter amendment. J Appl Anim Res 9(4):518-529.

26.

Michel V, Prampart E, Mirabito L, Allain V, Arnould C, Huonnic D, Albaric O 2012 Histologically validated footpad dermatitis scoring system for use in chicken processing plants. Br Poult Sci 53(3):275-281.

27.

Miller BF 1968 Comparative yield of different size turkey carcasses. Poult Sci 47(5):1570-1574.

28.

Nahm KH 2005 Factors influencing nitrogen mineralization during poultry litter composting and calculations for available nitrogen. World's Poult Sci J 61(2):238-255.

29.

Nestor KE, Bacon WL, Saif YM, Renner PA 1985 The influence of genetic increases in shank width on body weight, walking ability, and reproduction of turkeys. Poult Sci 64(12):2248-2255.

30.

Oh H, Kang DG, Kwon TO, Jang KK, Chai KY, Yun YG, Lee HS 2003 Four glycosides from the leaves of Abeliophyllum distichum with inhibitory effects on angiotensin converting enzyme. Phytother Res 17(7), 811-813.

31.

Oliveira MC, Almeida CV, Andrade DO, Rodrigues SM 2003 Teor de matéria seca, pH e amônia volatilizada da cama de frango tratada ou não com diferentes aditivos. Bras Zootecn 32:951-954.

32.

Park GH, Park JH, Eo HJ, Song HM, Woo SH, Kim MK, Jeong JB 2014 The induction of activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) contributes to anti-cancer activity of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai in human colorectal cancer cells. BMC Complement Altern Med 14:1-9.

33.

Park S, Lee J, Song D, Chang S, An J, Jeon K, Cho J 2023 Effects of spraying illite and zeolite on litter quality, microflora, and footpad dermatitis in broiler litter. Korean J Poult Sci 50(4):273-282.

34.

Reece FN, Lott BD, Deaton JW 1980 Ammonia in the atmosphere during brooding affects performance of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 59(3):486-488.

35.

Sahoo SP, Kaur D, Sethi APS, Sharma A, Chandra M, Chandrahas 2017 Effect of chemically amended litter on litter quality and broiler performance in winter. J Appl Anim Res 45(1):533-537.

36.

Škrbić Z, Pavlovski Z, Lukić M, Petričević V 2014 Effects of rearing system and body weight of Redbro broilers on the frequency and severity of footpad dermatitis. Biotechnol Anim Husb 30(2):313-320.

37.

Soliman ES, Sallam NH, Abouelhassan EM 2018 Effectiveness of poultry litter amendments on bacterial survival and Eimeria oocyst sporulation. Vet World 11(8):1064.

38.

Song DC, Lee JH, Oh HJ, Kim YJ, An JW, Chang SY, Cho JH 2021 Antibacterial and anti-obesity effects of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai: an in vitro study. Korean J Agric Sci 48(3):557-565.

39.

Vilela MDO, Gates RS, Souza CF, Teles Junior CG, Sousa FC 2020 Nitrogen transformation stages into ammonia in broiler production: sources, deposition, transformation, and emission into the environment. Dyna 87(214):221-228.

40.

Wang L, Liu Z, Beasley DB, Munilla R, Baughman GR 2006 Measuring ammonia emissions from broiler litter. In 2006 ASAE Annual Meeting (p. 1). Amer Soci Agri Biol Eng.

41.

Weatherburn MW 1967 Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem 39(8):971-974.

42.

Xavier DB, Broom DM, McManus CMP, Torres C, Bernal FEM 2010 Number of flocks on the same litter and carcase condemnations due to cellulitis, arthritis and contact foot-pad dermatitis in broilers. Br Poult Sci 51(5):586-591.

43.

Yoo TK, Kim JS, Hyun TK 2020 Polyphenolic composition and anti-melanoma activity of white forsythia (Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai) organ extracts. Plants 9(6):757.