Table 6. Sensory evaluation of chicken patties with different amounts of propolis extract
Treatments1 | Propolis extract (%) |
0 (Control) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Favor | 3.40±0.55 | 3.20±0.45 | 3.20±0.84 | 3.20±0.84 |
Texture | 3.40±0.55 | 3.40±0.55 | 3.60±0.55 | 3.60±0.55 |
Juiciness | 3.00±0.00 | 3.10±0.22 | 3.20±0.45 | 3.30±0.97 |
Hardness | 3.20±0.45 | 3.20±0.45 | 3.20±0.84 | 3.20±0.84 |
Total preference | 4.14±1.12a | 3.00±1.07ab | 2.71±1.28ab | 2.00±1.31b |
Flavor, 1: bad – 5: good; Texture, 1: crumbly – 5: tough; Juiciness, 1: dry – 5: juicy; hardness, 1: soft – 5: hard.
Values with different superscripts in the same row indicate a significant difference, as determined by their means±standard deviations (P<0.05).
0(Control), no additive in the patty; 0.1, addition 0.1% propolis extract in the patty; 0.2, addition 0.2% propolis extract in the patty; 0.4, addition 0.4% propolis extract in the patty.